February 16th, 2011
I’m just jealous because I can’t think of a cool code name.
I’m only really a secret politician. I’m not going to come out and say I have any importance in student politics. I do have a job (President of the Philosophy Student’s Association), but as far as I’m concerned it’s not a wildly coveted duty — at least partially because I don’t get paid like SAFA or the SFUO — and yet deal with at least some levels of political bullshit.
At the University of Ottawa student politics are serious business. From my conversations with people at other schools students politics are a joke and are often happy to accept that role. I appreciate a strong student government a lot, if students have a lot of power then they can improve the experience at the school, mobilize change and attempt to modernize ancient school policies.
Which begs the question why we have such a low student satisfaction here at UofO. I’d like to speculate, but I’m poorly informed and despite the previous two paragraphs the SFUO and student government are not actually what I want to talk about here today.
There is a new website making its rounds in the UO community, known as UOleaks (please google it if you want to read it, I’m not giving the satisfaction of another referring site). A student run blog, that is allowing me to lose even more faith in the system here.
UOleaks is a website that has decided to make the SFUO and administration ‘accountable’ ironic when you realize every blogger on the site operates under an alias, and that the WHOIS information for the domain name is hidden. UOleaks posts ‘tips’ they receive from the student body and comment on them, with a strong political bias. And you know what? That’s fine, if you have an opinion I want to hear it — but I want to hear it from you, not some board of shadowy figures.
I have made no secret that I find the Fulcrum, our student newspaper, extremely bland (and Dear Di to be one of the most horrible things ever printed on a frequent basis). However, Fulcrum writers take responsibility for their writing, and UOleaks hides.
And for fear of what? Last I checked this was student politics, not a police state. What are they going to do to you, UOleaks? Or is there another reason you don’t want us to know who you are. You coy bastards, what’s that under your webskirt?
I have suspected since the beginning that I know one of the authors, again, my connection to student politics and the slant at which the journal is written, plus where I found the link. Don’t worry, love, I’m not going to out you. But accept your words. I’m sick of this site’s declaration of accountability without being accountable themselves. They have this air of being liberators and informers of the student population, but can they be trusted?
My concern goes along these lines, without names, or identifiers of any kind, how do we know this hasn’t been written by candidates in the election? Based on the strong political leanings of the site (all the authors being nearly unanimous in their election decisions) it doesn’t seem so far fetched given this is the case. If there was some real dialogue about candidates I would be far less likely to get my tinfoil hat on.
And in many cases I agree with UOleaks, independently, I voted for almost all their recommendations. Except Communications (I’m sorry, the candidate they picked for Communications had a seat on the BOA, and certainly only once attended our Arts Board meetings, you had a chance I don’t trust you to communicate. Sorry.)
So, Uoleaks, grow up, honestly. Maybe then I’ll take your bitching seriously.
Of course, no one takes my bitching seriously even with my name unveiled, so I do understand you pain.